So what will she publish now?
Martha Stewart Living......BEHIND BARS!! hehehe!!
TOO BAD WE DONT HANG PEOPLE. THEY SHOULD SHOOT THE B*TCH. HER PRODUCTS ARE WAY TOO EXPENSIVE AND SHE IS MEAN TO PEOPLE I HEARD. RICH PEOPLE CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT IT SEEMS SO I'M GLAD FOR A CHANGE ONE OF THEM IS GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS. IN MODERN SOCIETY TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE FORGOT WHAT HONESTY IS!
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Huh???TOO BAD WE DONT HANG PEOPLE. THEY SHOULD SHOOT THE B*TCH. HER PRODUCTS ARE WAY TOO EXPENSIVE AND SHE IS MEAN TO PEOPLE I HEARD. RICH PEOPLE CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT IT SEEMS SO I'M GLAD FOR A CHANGE ONE OF THEM IS GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS. IN MODERN SOCIETY TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE FORGOT WHAT HONESTY IS!
Jeckyl meet Hyde...
I JUST DON'T LIKE TO SEE RICH PEOPLE GET AWAY WITH THINGS LIKE THAT. AND I DON'T LIKE HER. SHE'S LIKE LEONA HELMSLEY. RICH AND MEAN.
Well I can agree with you on that MIPS. It's about time that societies elite get their comeupance, HOWEVER, of those that need some time behind bars, I'd put Martha WAY down on the list.
Oh God! What is this world coming to? For the second time in two days I agree with Jumper!! Oh woe is me! [img]graemlins/cry.gif[/img] [img]eek.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/wonder.gif[/img]
From what I heard she's looking at 20 years, but the "legal analyst" said she'd probably do just 4.
Which, of course, again begs the question of why crimes carry sentences that aren't served?
Bookmarks